Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Keith Porteous's avatar

What would the actuaries say? $12,000/year to operate your car, vs taxis, public transit, and renting a car for the weekend, 4 times/year. It’s currently $33/day for the car. Can you replace the transport needs and convenience with alternatives, for less than $33/day? Presumably, out of the 364 days of the year, there will be a quantifiable number of days where you would not need a taxi or public transit, or the need to rent a car. Let’s pick 100 days, where you would not use your car. That’s $3300 of “wasted expenditure”, leaving $8700 of the $12000. $8700 divided by the 264 days you need a car comes out to $33/day. In other words. It’s the same cost per year to not own a car, but with far less convenience. You’re welcome?🙃

Gord McCaw's avatar

Jesus H. Christ that's bloody awful! Even worse that you're being stonewalled by the insurance people. Is a class action suit down the road possible? Or feasible? There is nobody that can say that you aren't being tested. I admire how nobly you've bounced back from all these trials...

No posts

Ready for more?